May 11, 2005                                                                                                                                     

 
ALLIANCE LEGISLATIVE REPORT (94-19)

 

       NEW SCHOOL FUNDING BILL PROPOSED

 

The Senate sponsors of the two most prominent school funding bills have gotten together and have proposed a new agreed bill. Senator James Meeks (I-Chicago), sponsor of SB 750, and Senator Rick

Winkel (R-Champaign), sponsor of SB 1484, together presented the proposal to the Senate Select Committee on Education Funding Reform Tuesday.

 

The initiative would provide more money to both elementary and secondary, and higher education, but would not provide non-discretionary funds for other parts of the State budget. However, new provisions would limit a school district’s access to local property tax funds.

 

The proposal has been filed as an amendment to SB 750 (Senate Amendment 5), SB 1484 (Senate Amendment 3), HB 755 (Senate Amendment 1), and SB 2 (Senate Amendment 1). Currently, SB 750 and SB 1484 are “shell bills”: they are on the Senate floor, contain no substantive language, but are in a posture to accept an amendment. All of these amendments currently sit in the Senate Rules Committee. The Senate Rules Committee would have to approve the amendments then send them to a substantive committee for debate – probably either the Education Committee or the Revenue Committee.

 

The proposal, generally, is a hybrid between SB 750 and SB 1484. The bill:

  • increases the State income tax rates for individuals from 3% to 5% and for corporations from 4.8% to 8% (this is estimated to generate $5.8 billion)
  • raises the foundation level in the school funding formula to $6,100 per pupil (currently the foundation level is $4,964). This amount would grow annually by the lesser of CPI or 3.5%.
  • increases funding for special education and other mandated categorical grants by $120 million
  • establishes a property tax abatement equal to 30% of the dollar amount for K-12 school property taxes from 2001 (paid in 2002) (estimated to be $3 billion)
  • provides $370 million to higher education (75% to universities; 25% for community colleges)
  • provides $190 million to counties and municipalities through the Local Government Distributive Fund (this is, generally, the same formula – 10% of income tax receipts – that is in current law)

 

The bill, however, does include new provisions not part of either SB 1484 or SB 750. The bill:

  • restricts access to local property taxes by school districts. To access additional property tax revenues, school districts could only do so by front door referendum, with 60% of the electors voting on the proposition voting in the affirmative. This would apply to the following funds/levies: special education, education, transportation, operations and maintenance, working cash, and bond issues.
  • increases the Earned Income Tax Credit fourfold (from 4% to 20%) – estimated at $200 million
  • creates a new renter’s tax credit – estimated at $150 million
  • doubles the eligible amounts of the income tax credit for payment of tuition to a private or parochial school from a $500 maximum to a $1,000 maximum – estimated at $65 million
  • creates the Education Assistance Fund Board to review foundation level increases bi-annually

 

This new version of the school funding/tax policy proposal was inevitable. Though much work went into the original SB 750 legislation, it had trouble getting momentum in the Capitol because of controversial revenue sources, a large amount of “non-discretionary spending” for the State of Illinois, and taxpayer fears of “property tax creep”. Therefore, the bill sponsors have removed the sales tax and retirement tax provisions, have narrowed the scope of the bill to education funding only, and have added the property tax limitations.

 

Since the original bill sponsors of SB 750 have presented this new proposal, it is evident that lawmakers will now be working off of this proposal – not the original HB 750/SB 750 from the last two years. That is why the Alliance organizations, anticipating this development, each adopted positions to “support the concepts” contained in the earlier versions of SB 750 and not give carte blanche support to the legislation. The Alliance will continue to push this issue, keep alive the school funding debate, and work on amending the undesirable components of this new proposal.

 

HB750/SB 750 (original)

SB 1484

New Proposal

Raises the income tax rate to 5% for individuals and 8% for corporations

 

Raises the income tax rate to 5% for individuals and 8% for corporations

Raises the income tax rate to 5% for individuals and 8% for corporations

Taxes retirement income

Does not tax retirement income

Does not tax retirement income

 

Expands sales tax to services

 

Does not expand sales tax to services

Does not expand sales tax to services

 

Eliminates a number of corporate tax credits

 

Does not eliminate corporate tax credits

Does not eliminate corporate tax credits

Total new taxes = $7.25 billion

 

Total new taxes = $5.8 billion

Total new taxes = $5.8 billion

Total property tax relief = $2.4 billion (generally, 25% of school property taxes)

 

Total property tax relief = $3.5 billion

Total property tax relief = $3 billion (generally, 30% of school property taxes)

Increases the per pupil foundation level in the school funding formula to $5,952

 

Increases the per pupil foundation level in the school funding formula to $5,964

Increases the per pupil foundation level in the school funding formula to $6,100

Does not provide funding for higher education

 

Provides $500 million for higher education

Provides $370 million for higher education

Provides $2 billion for other State spending (structural deficit)

Does not provide funding for other State spending

Does not provide funding for other State spending

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HB750/SB 750 (original)

SB 1484

New Proposal

Provides $900 million in tax credits for low income taxpayers

 

Does not provide tax credits for low income taxpayers

Provides $200 million for low income taxpayers by quadrupling the Earned Income Tax Credit

Does not provide additional funding for mandated categorical grants

 

Does not provide additional funding for mandated categorical grants

Provides additional funding for mandated categorical grants

Does not increase the eligible amount for the income tax credit for private school tuition

 

Does not increase the eligible amount for the income tax credit for private school tuition

Does increase the eligible amount for the income tax credit for private school tuition

Does not change requirements for accessing local property tax funds by school districts

Does not change requirements for accessing local property tax funds by school districts

Does change requirements for accessing local property tax funds by school districts. Need 60% affirmative vote by front door referendum in special education, education, transportation, operations and maintenance, working cash, and bond funds.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BILL ACTION THIS WEEK

 

SB 383 (Link, D-Vernon Hills) requires the ISBE to adopt rules for the documentation of school plan reviews and inspections of school facilities and to convene a task force for the purpose of reviewing these documents and making recommendations regarding training and accreditation of individuals performing reviews or inspections. The bill was approved by the House Elementary and Secondary Education Committee and was sent to the House floor for consideration.

 

SB 574 (del Valle, D-Chicago) creates the College and Career Success for All Students Act to require a teacher of an Advanced Placement course to obtain appropriate training and to requires the ISBE to establish training guidelines for teachers of Advanced Placement courses. The bill was approved by the House Elementary and Secondary Education Committee and was sent to the House.

 

SB 575 (del Valle) increases high school graduation requirements as proposed by the Governor. The bill was approved by the House Elementary and Secondary Education Committee and was sent to the House floor for consideration.

 

HB 2002 (Dugan, D-Kankakee) includes failing to disclose relevant information on an application for employment as a teacher regarding arrest or conviction of a sexual offense as a reason to have a teacher’s certificate suspended. The bill was approved by the House Elementary and Secondary Education Committee and was sent to the House floor for consideration.

 

Alliance Legislative Reports:                                                           www.iasb.com

Bill Text/Status: Illinois General Assembly                                     www.ilga.gov